Kant and Modern Philosophy Audiobook
Kant and Modern Philosophy Audiobook
- Paul Metcale
- Authors Republic
- 2019-11-04
- 3 h 7 min
Summary:
Kant’s system is stated, analyzed, and duly reconstructed. Upon this basis, cogent analyses of induction, causation, and technological method are put forth.
Introduction
Component 1. The Cogency of Kant’s Transcendental Quarrels
The ambiguity of the word “concept”
“Synthetic” and “a priori” defined
Kant’s conception of a priority and analyticity
Kant’s conception of non-analyticity
Kant around the role of paraperceptual ideation in analytical idea
Transcendental?Analyticity-based
Kant’s crypto- about Kant and Modern Philosophy empiricism
Arithmetic not really a priori
Transcendentalism=Psychologism
Kant’s rearguard empiricism
Why Kant’s positions are non-etheless correct
A priori knowledge a prerequisite for any posteriori knowledge
Kant on Hume on Causation
Component 2. The Analogue-Digital Distinction and the Purely Reasonable Basis of Induction and Causal
Explanation
The idea of instantaneousness
Hume’s placement doubly erroneous
The analogue-digital distinction
The existence of required connections of the non-instantaneousness of most spatiotemporal
existence
Temporal order to become understood in terms of causation, not vice versa
The spuriousness of Hume’s argument for spontaneous creation
Summary of sections I-VI.
Induction an operation on analogue-content
Perceptual content not digitizable
The spuriousness of Hume’s argument for the legitimacy of counterpredictive inductions
The lands of inductive inference vs. linguistic representations of such grounds
Hume’s associationism false regarding our theories, accurate only regarding Hume’s
ideas about our ideas
Some Consequences of our System
The non-probativeness of a number of the standard arguments for skepticism
The Kantian roots of the system
These points in relation to the type of probability
Whitehead and Russell in spatiotemporal order
The crypto-conversativism of epistemic relativism
Chomsky’s epistemic conservativism
Ontogenetic a posteriori ? phylogenetic a priori
Chomsky’s rationalism in fact an extreme type of empiricism
The unconscious