Can we trust our senses to reveal the truth?

Challenging leading scientific theories that declare that our senses survey back objective truth, cognitive scientist Donald Hoffman argues that even though we should take our perceptions seriously, we should not take them literally. How can it be possible that the globe we see is not objective actuality? And how can our senses become useful if they’re not communicating the truth? Hoffman grapples with these queries and moreover the course of this eye- about The Case Against Truth: Why Evolution Hid the Truth from Our Eye opening work.

Since Homo sapiens has walked the earth, natural selection has favored perception that hides the truth and manuals us toward useful action, shaping our senses to hold us alive and reproducing. We see a speeding car , nor walk in front of it; we observe mold developing on bread and don’t consume it. These impressions, though, aren’t objective reality. Just like a document icon on a desktop screen is certainly a useful sign rather than real representation of just what a pc file looks like, the objects we see each day are merely icons, permitting us to navigate the world safely and easily.

The real-world implications because of this breakthrough are huge. From examining why style designers create clothes that provide the illusion of a far more “attractive” physique to studying how companies use color to elicit specific emotions in customers, as well as dismantling the notion that spacetime is certainly objective reality, The Case Against Reality dares us to question everything we thought we knew about the world we see.